As Millennials Demand Moreeaning Older BrdAre Not Aging Well

The apps, books, movies, music, TV shows, and art are inspiring our some of the most creative people in business this month

The struggles and triumphs of prominent women in leadership positions

The major tech ecosystems that battle for our attention and dollars

Whats next for hardware, software, and services

Our annual guide to the businesses that matter the most

Leaders who are shaping the future of business in creative ways

New workplaces, new food sources, new medicine–even an entirely new economic system

Celebrating the best ideas in business

An award-winning team of journalists, designers, and videographers who tell brand stories through Fast Companys distinctive lens

As Millennials Demand More Meaning, Older Brands Are Not Aging Well

Ask millennials and boomers what companies they value most and youll get very different answers. If brands want to make an impact with the consumers of the future, they need a clear mission.

How can age-challenged brands mean more to younger people? In short, develop more meaning.

Serving an older population is a great thing, so long as thats what a company intends to dolike AARP serving those 55 and older. But some major mass-market brands mean much less to younger generations than to older generationscreating significant risk for the longevity of those companies.

This year, my agencyEnsosWorld Value Indexscored 150 brands according to how a nationally representative sample of Americans identify the brands purpose, the extent to which the purpose identified aligns with their own values, and the extent to which it motivates brand advocacy and purchase.

The results are strikingly different for different demographics. For instance, Americans over 55 years old (boomers) rate Newmans Own the No. 7 brand, whereas those 18- to 34-year-olds (millennials) rate Newmans Own No. 81. Without building stronger support from younger generations, Newmans Own risks declining sales over time and eroding the brand equity that the company has spent decades building.

Similarly, AAA, Pfizer, and Samsung have significantly lower ranking by millennials than by boomers, and Levi Strauss resonates most with those age 35- and 54-year-olds (gen-Xers).

AAA: millennial rank: No. 92; boomer rank: No. 26

Pfizer: millennial rank: No. 136; boomer rank: No. 65

Samsung: millennial rank: No. 74; boomer rank: No. 19

Levi Strauss: millennial rank: No. 91; gen X rank: No. 35

The millennial generation isthe largest in historysignificantly larger than even the boomer generationand reported to control$24 trillion dollars of wealth by 2020, so missing this generation could send brands into terminal decline.

There are a few reasons why brands may underperform with younger people. In some cases, products become more relevant at older agesPfizers pharmaceuticals, for instance. In other cases, cultural mega-trends are against brands, like the declining importance of car ownership to younger people (affecting AAA and Chevrolet) or the declining attraction of smoking to young people (affecting Marlboro). For Newmans Own, the cultural relevance of its iconic founder, Paul Newman, may naturally decline with time.

But most brands do not have these forces against themthey may just be underperforming in this era relative to previous eras.

Large, diversified packaged goods companies are often respected as the most sophisticated marketers in business, able to develop brands that resonate throughout customers lives. But gen-Xers rank Johnson & Johnson at No. 11 while millennials rank it at No. 40, despite its products being appropriate for all ages and millennials being the target market for J&Js babycare products. Similarly, Proctor & Gamble is ranked No. 12 by boomers, but a lowly No. 103 with millennialsa huge disparity, despite spendingmore than $7 billion dollarsper year in advertising (includingefforts to make millennials care about fabric softener).

Which brands are outperforming with younger generations? Unsurprisingly, a lot of web and tech companies like Twitter, Snapchat, PayPal, Spotify, Uber, and Kickstarter. But also some physical products like Starbucks (rank No. 111 by boomers, No. 25 by millennials), Honest Company, Chipotle, and H&M (rank No. 142 by gen X, No. 69 by millennials).

How can age-challenged brands mean more to younger people? In short, develop more meaning.

When we look at the brands performing well, many of them have a clear mission. Despite being only six years old, Honest Companys stands for product transparency and healthy families have helped it to a No. 34 ranking for millennials (No. 84 for boomers), significantly above Pampers ranking for millennials of No. 76. This is a microcosm of a larger shift: Procter & Gambles largest global brand, generating sales of over $8 billion per year, being de-positioned by a millennial-focused brand with much clearer, more overt values.

Similarly, Starbucks has taken strong stands around healthy communities, ethical sourcing, social justice, and environmental progress. Those stands have helped it to a ranking of No. 25 for millennials (No. 111 for Boomers). Always, another P&G brand that has taken a different approach to marketing with its Like A Girl campaign, has effectively championed girls potential and won broad support from millennials, who rank it the No. 29 brand (boomers: No. 99).

Our research suggests millennials care about social issues in much greater numbers than older generations. Sixty-eight percent of millennials say creating change in the world is a personal goal that they actively pursue, while a minority of boomers do (42%).

And millennials are personally acting on this intention: 41% say they have recently taken concrete action (like protesting in a march, volunteering in a campaign, or canvassing a neighborhood for signatures), whereas only 17% of boomers have.

Having a global outlook and encouraging diversity are also traits that are likely to align millennials with brands: 77% of millennials say experiencing other cultures is important to them, whereas only 64% of boomers do.

Resonating with these core motivations of young peopleto affect the world around them, to be part of positive action, to experience other culturesis clearly an approach to increasing brand relevance with those people.

But a note of caution: Having a strong purpose does not absolve the need for effective communication. Newmans Owns travails with young people are partly because only 39% of millennials could identify any purpose in the brand, beyond making profit despite the company giving 100% of profits to charitable causes and championing organic food. Similarly, Pampers has done tremendous work invaccinating against neonatal tetanus, but its possible that too-few Americans know about this initiative.

Sometimes companies dont do a good job engaging young people in the good work they do, and sometimes companies actively downplay good works out of a sense of humility. While humility can be laudable, younger people in particular are seeking greater impact and brands of meaningand theres a powerful role for brands to play in enabling that impact. Engaging more young people in impact sets up a virtuous cycle for the brand of increasing brand resonance, increased commerce, increased positive impact, and increased fulfillment for people.

Both the substance of meaningful action and peoples perceptions of that action matter to long-term support of brands purposes.

Young people are making brand choicessome of which will last a lifetime in an era of dramatic political and cultural events. Those brands that stand in accordance with young peoples values will be more likely to win the future than those that do not fully understand them or ignore them out of risk aversion or ambivalence.

ensoworks withQuadrant Strategiesto field the World Value Index. Download a copyhere.

Receive special Fast Company offers.

Nonprofits know they need to get more diversebut they arent

This website works to decide which global issues need fixing first

Watch this video of workers recognizing how much power they have

Ben Affleck, Matt Damon re-team for McDonalds Monopoly scam movie

This Spanish kitchen appliance ad will give you the Friday feels

Why the difference between persuasion and manipulation matters

How the U.S. is getting more violent, by the numbers

The computer of the future might hang around your neck

Apples lesser-known engineering feat? Its buildings

How the Smithsonian is turning its art exhibitions into virtual reality experiences

Your guide to navigating 4 types of interviews

Is Apple a money machine or still worthy of true faith? Its both